tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2777122575539464943.post8768601068977082964..comments2024-03-28T17:59:52.236+02:00Comments on Trenduri economice: Bretton Woods II ?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2777122575539464943.post-86713760841944459982008-10-27T10:09:00.000+02:002008-10-27T10:09:00.000+02:00Si eu mi-am pus aceeasi intrebare inca de cand Pau...Si eu mi-am pus aceeasi intrebare inca de cand Paulson a facut primul bailout: de ce nu lasa bancile sa cada? Vor ramane bancile care nu s-au hazardat si care vor prelua/cumpara pe cele falimentare.<BR/><BR/>Ar fi fost 1 an de stagnare economica, poate un inceput de recesiune, pana cand oamenii concediati vor fi absorbiti de sistem si bancile se vor fi restructurat.Dan Predahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17068781715628216193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2777122575539464943.post-59278811260691079542008-10-27T06:35:00.000+02:002008-10-27T06:35:00.000+02:00Articolul tau imi aduce aminte de un eseu teribil ...Articolul tau imi aduce aminte de un eseu teribil al lui Henry Mergenau, "Functiile incompetentei": http://pm1.bu.edu/~tt/neat/incomp.pdfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2777122575539464943.post-80706016783047473682008-10-26T23:43:00.000+02:002008-10-26T23:43:00.000+02:00Titlul ar trebui revizuit:Breton Woods I - 1944Bre...Titlul ar trebui revizuit:<BR/><BR/>Breton Woods I - 1944<BR/><BR/>Breton Woods II - 1972, cursuri flotante <BR/><BR/><BR/>Breton Woods III - va urma? :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com